A proper Christian would never be that bad (note the emphasis on the word "proper"). And by "that bad", I mean this:
because you cant prove that theres no god, he exists. omg darwin was a fuccin retard like you. your fooled by those idiots who call themselfs 'scientists' and beleife that the stoopid evolution myth was reel. its not. evolution is fuccin horesshit and your fuccin retarted.For them to do that, they would firstly have to do the non-Christian thing and say insulting, hateful, and quite frankly incorrect things about you and everything you believe in. Note that I believe that evolution happens, but I do not believe that it was how we came to be, so, unless I were to go retro with my Christianness and my intelligence, to be honest, I probably wouldn't actually say that to you, because then I would be stupid.
Let me kindly point out that in 1976, a group of Russian scientists managed to work out that the Sun was a very young star and could not be more than 7,500 years old [citation given].
Let me also kindly point out that we have a bunch of fucking trolls who don't know how to read articles properly or edit them properly [link]. Let's take a look, after a reasonable amount (in your terminology, more than tons) of evidence pointing towards creationism:
Conclusion:Let's look at that again:
Creationism seems overwhelming and provable as compared to the implausible, evolutionism.
Answer:
Evolution has been observed and the evidence is piling up. Creationism has no proof nor evidence whatsoever and usually the creation "scientists" blatantly lie about Evolution to turn people to Creationism and others simply state things that are not true from their own ignorance of the subject.
Creationism has no proof nor evidence whatsoever...Uh, you just skipped past 13 pieces of evidence, are you fucking blind, explaining why creationism is more likely to be correct than evolution, are you fucking blind, and yet you refuse to, are you fucking blind, contemplate that there just might be a possibility, are you fucking blind, that some form of creationism, are you fucking blind, is how we came to be, are you fucking blind, and that evolution, are you fucking blind, is merely, are you fucking blind, a fairytale.
Woo. I close my eyes, and my keyboard and screen do not exist because I can't see them.
What the fuck. I just typed that with my eyes closed and it came out perfectly, and no, I do not have spellcheck (well, an automatic one, anyway, and I didn't use it on that sentence, you have my word). I suprise myself sometimes when I do that and it all feels wrong but comes out exactly as I wanted it to.
Don't forget that the conclusion was already given. After all, I can prank-edit a wiki better than you can edit one normally (I only did this once, by the way). Have a look at that link. Note how I've incorporated it into the text, rather than placing a statement contradicting both the text and the feel of the text.
Who would be to blame for that atrocity (sp?) ?
First answer by King kong92. Last edit by Socialrev.Socialrev, I can prank-edit a wiki better than you can edit one normally.
OK, now, I was trying to look for a particular page about written records only dating back to something like 3000 BC, but stumbled across that WikiAnswers page instead, so I'll put that here instead:
According to evolutionists, stone age man existed for 100,000 years before beginning to make written records about 4000 to 5000 years ago. Prehistoric man built megalithic monuments, made beautiful cave paintings, and kept records of lunar phases. Why would he wait a thousand centuries before using the same skills to record history? The Biblical time scale is much more likely.Oh yeah, there's this, too, which makes the idea of "evolution of language" sound kinda silly: A language dies every two weeks. Now, sure, you might say that this is merely old languages being replaced by newer ones. However, I would have to say that this sort of shit wouldn't actually properly decay when there's about 7,000 different languages in this world, and that, as far as I know, none of them are what we should call "primitive" (unless we're talking about languages we KNOW have been constructed)...
Many of the languages are not easily translated into English. In the endangered south Siberian language Todzhu, for example, the word "chary" means "2-year-old male castrated reindeer that can be used for riding."If evolution of language was part of how we came to be, then there would be around 50-100 languages today.
Also, why the fuck would someone wait for about 95,000 years before coming up with a language? Seriously, are you fucking blind, et cetera...
Now, those of you who say that the Bible is bullshit (Yay, we get to bring the Bible into this! Oh, goody! Now this post gets really offensive!) obviously don't agree with any of these passages (quoted from my GNB/TEV)...
- Proverbs 10:14 - The wise get all the knowledge they can, but when fools speak, trouble is not far off.
- Proverbs 20:3 - Any fool can start arguments; the honourable thing is to stay out of them.
- Proverbs 26:16 - A lazy person will think he is more intelligent than seven people who can give good reasons for their opinions.
- Proverbs 12:16 - When a fool is annoyed, he quickly lets it be known. Sensible people will ignore an insult.
- Proverbs 13:16 - Sensible people always think before they act, but stupid people advertise their ignorance.
- Proverbs 14:13 - Laughter may hide sadness. When happiness is gone, sorrow is always there.
- Proverbs 14:15 - A fool will believe anything; sensible people watch their step.
- Ecclesiastes 10:1 - Dead flies can make a whole bottle of perfume stink, and a little stupidity can cancel out the greatest wisdom.
[9] What has happened before will happen again. What has been done before will be done again. There is nothing new in the whole world. [10] "Look," they say, "here is something new!" But no, it has all happened before, long before we were born. [11] No one remembers what has happened in the past, and no one in days to come will remember what happens between now and then.While I do admit that there probably wasn't much in the way of electricity back then, this principle can quite safely be applied to atheism and bible-bashing in general. The scariest thing about a lot of the Bible is that it's so reflective of the world we live in today: people half-assing the worship of God and thinking they're OK, forgetting to follow what he actually wants (e.g. the Jewish leaders of Jesus' time), or completely ignoring God and trying to shove him out completely (e.g. the Baals).
If you still think I'm stupid... Oh look! I did research! I suppose that's a new concept for you. And not from just one source, and not 100% Christian resources (most of them kinda are). On top of that, I could cite some stuff from the Bible, too, which is true even today. Looking back at Proverbs 26:16: "A lazy person will think he is more intelligent than seven people who can give good reasons for their opinions." If you're sure you're smarter than me, and feel certain that there is no God, you're living proof of this.
After all, I didn't say "If you think you're smarter than me". Read it again. And I'm not saying you're right, either.
The fact of the matter is that I at least did some research, and I'm still not going to be blatantly certain.
And now I'm going to explain why the Big Rip is a crock of shit.
Big rip theory goes something like this: Some time in the 1980s, someone spots a supernova somewhere, "scientists" "calculate" the distance and "find" that it's a ridiculous amount of light years away, they use their previous "calculations" and "work out" that the universe "is" expanding at an exponential rate.
But for this to be continuous and consistent, there would not be a Big Bang®, and all the matter and the energy of the universe would have always been there (read: it'd be infinite), very early on barely moving, then it would start burning up, and once all the potential energy has been used up, for it to continue, it would have to violate the laws of thermodynamics, which you guys just love doing.
If the Big Rip is true, then NO IT DID NOT FUCKING "START" AT ZERO. Allow me to demonstrate.
The formula for any exponential trend is:
y = Ae^(kx)
k affects the rate, and A affects the amplitude. When taking a trend, these are constants, meaning they don't change.
When does y equal zero? Two possibilities, perhaps?
One possibility: A was zero all along. Which means that y is always zero. However, the size of the universe isn't zero, is it? Of course not. So, one possibility left.
We will have to find x ourselves.
y/A = e^(kx)
ln(y/A) = kx
(ln(y) - ln(A)) / k = x
Set y to zero, and we get:
x = (-∞ - ln(A)) / k
x = (-∞) / k
x = -∞
Infinity tends to engulf finite numbers. No shit. Really, you're not going to reach infinity, are you? Try it now. Go on, get infinitely away from me. Didn't work, did it?
Two things:
- -∞ + SOME FUCKING HUGE YET FINITE NUMBER = -∞
- 0 - SOME FUCKING HUGE YET FINITE NUMBER > -∞
So an exponential curve is not appropriate for this model.
I propose that, if evolution is to be believed, then we'd have a sine curve. Or maybe we have a sigmoid?
Always remember: math and logic are necessary for science to work. If it fucks up logically, and/or fucks up mathematically, it ought to fuck up scientifically, too.
I don't see any reason for the universe to continue expanding as gravity is all around us, and the universe would be slowing down due to the gravity, resulting in a Big Crunch.
Oops. Apparently this phenomenon is called the Big Bounce. My bad. The Big Crunch is really shitty in terms of evolution.
Please take the time to remind yourself that I don't actually believe in any of this shit, I'm just pointing out how shitty the Big Rip is in comparison with some of the other shit I don't believe. Don't believe me? Read on.
The problem with the Big Bounce is that some of that energy escapes as heat and other shit you can't use due to friction, where the energy escapes as heat. For matter and energy to be infinite, due to friction, it would have to end at some point (the Big Crunch), and before that lead to infinite chaos. Heck, even your "scientists" don't like the idea of an oscillating universe, according to Wikipedia:
This scenario allows the Big Bang to have been immediately preceded by the Big Crunch of a preceding universe. If this occurs repeatedly, we have an oscillatory universe. The universe could then consist of an infinite sequence of finite universes, each finite universe ending with a Big Crunch that is also the Big Bang of the next universe. Theoretically, the oscillating universe could not be reconciled with the second law of thermodynamics: entropy would build up from oscillation to oscillation and cause heat death. Other measurements suggested the universe is not closed. These arguments caused cosmologists to abandon the oscillating universe model. A somewhat similar idea is embraced by the cyclic model, but this idea evades heat death, because of an expansion of the branes that dilutes entropy accumulated in the previous cycle.I'm getting tired so I may be dribbling around here.
So, uh... I think the concept of the Big Bang is fucked, especially when the current "scientific" theory points to there being a beginning...
At first, there was nothing. Which exploded.
That's what they're saying.
Whereas "my" proposal is that there was some intelligent entity which was always there and able to create stuff, designing and creating our universe out of its imagination. What we know about this theory is that some things were made in an order which actually works, no shit. Although it would be very interesting to know a more elaborate version of the story we have. But it still wouldn't make people like you shut the fuck up, would it? No, you're too selfish to accept responsibility.
I really can't be fucked with this post anymore, so, uh, yeah, time for me to conclude:
Yes we do have evidence supporting our claims which, in turn, pisses on yours. Don't say that we have no evidence, or else you'll lose credibility. Otherwise, your water would be much saltier, you'll be much more scorched, and you'll be walking on spikes. Oh yeah, and you wouldn't know anything about that Halley guy.
Why am I still a Christian? Because it seems to work, and if Atheists were correct, life would suck, as we'd have no free will. I haven't even covered souls yet. When I get a "message from God", I don't merely imagine it, I actually see something which would slip past the minds of most, e.g. 1317. I actually have photos showing both parts of the context. Yet I don't use just this to say "Aha! There's definitely a God!"
I haven't even gone into why you, and not me, are the "brainwashed" ones. This should at least begin to explain it, if you'd like to skip the bit where they're showing stuff on TV, then go for it. I may cover that later, when I'm not so tired.
So, uh, yeah, first post in a while, and stuff.
